Pharmaceutical major Novartis which dared to challenge the Indian patent system is fighting tooth and nail against the decision of Chennai Patent Office to reject its patent application for beta-crystalline form of Imatinib Mesylate, has now raised an objection against the formation of two-member bench of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB), in particularly objecting the presence of S. Chandrashekran as a technical member pursuant to section 116(2) of the Patents Act 1970. Novartis alleged it was under the tenure of S. Chandrashekran as a Controller General of Patents the application for beta-crystalline form of Imatinib Mesylate was rejected, and also that he was acting as a party in the recent court case reviewing the decision of the Indian Patent Office to reject application for beta-crystalline Imatinib Mesylate. However, Chandrasekran denied any conflict of interest stating that the application was rejected at the Chennai Patent Office by the Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs.
No comments:
Post a Comment